California State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer, whose new online poker bill is far more comprehensive than previous drafts, would welcome racetracks and PokerStars into the Golden State video gaming market too.
A new California on the web poker bill, sponsored by State Assemblyman Reggie Jones-Sawyer (D-Los Angeles), has become on the table to oppose the bill introduced by fellow State Assemblyman Mike Gatto in December.
The Sawyer-Jones bill, AB 167, seeks to establish ‘a proper regulatory structure in place that delivers safe and compliant internet poker access,’ the assemblyman announced yesterday.
So how do the two new bills compare? And more to the level, how does the Jones-Sawyer that is new bill with his past bill, AB2291, which foundered regarding the rocks of final year’s legislative session?
No actors that are bad
Jones-Sawyer said by the end of the 2014 session that the new, revised bill would be a high concern for 2015, and indicated that this time, the ‘bad actor’ language would be softened. The non-severable actor that is bad of AB229 shown to be a sticking point for stakeholders, and caused a significant schism between those who wanted PokerStars in the market and the ones who didn’t.
Sure enough, AB 167 seems to own eliminated those actor that is bad, apparently clearing the way for PokerStars to enter a regulated California market. Those precluded from applying for a poker that is online, states the bill, include:
‘The individual [who] has contemptuously defied an investigative that is legislative, or other formal investigative human anatomy of a state or of the united states of america or a foreign jurisdiction, when that body is engaged in the investigation of crimes relating to poker, official corruption related to poker activities, or unlawful profiteering activity or organized crime, as defined in area l 86.2 of the Penal Code.’
The bill continues to clarify a position that is key could directly affect PokerStars possible entry into the Golden State market, given its previously vilified owners vs. its new, ‘clean slate’ ones.
‘ The individual [who] was convicted in a court of competent jurisdiction of the felony consisting of either having accepted a bet over the Internet in violation of United States or California law, or having aided or abetted that unlawful task.’
Note the use associated with the word ‘person,’ which suggests that PokerStars, by divesting itself of its previous owners, against whom there were outstanding DOJ indictments, would be able to be involved in the California online market unscathed.
Anti-PokerStars Coalition Denounces Language
The language is in sharp contrast with that of final 12 months’s bill from Jones-Sawyer, which proposed to exclude ‘any brand or business title, including any brand that is derivative with the exact same or similar wording, or any trade or service mark, software, technology, operational system, customer information, or other data acquired, derived, or developed directly or indirectly from any operation that has accepted a bet or engaged in a financial transaction associated with such wager from any person in america on any type of online gaming after December 31, 2006.’
If Jones-Sawyer believes his bill will sail through with the backing associated with the stakeholders, however, he has another think coming, as the anti-PokerStars tribal coalition wasted no amount of time in denouncing this language.
‘There is a lot for tribes to dislike about it bill,’ said Pechanga Chairman Mark Macarro. ‘we have been disappointed that the bill disregards important principles from a broad coalition of respected tribes and card spaces that help prevent corporations and entities that previously violated law that is federal profiting from tainted software, brands, and databases derived from illegal activity.’
Photo Finish for Racetracks and Liquidity
Other news that is major AB 167 may be the inclusion of California racetracks in a post-regulation landscape, which many felt was in fact unjustly ignored by previous bills. The sharing of liquidity with other states, expressly forbidden in preceding draft bills, appears to be on the menu this time, and there is also a suggestion that players on unlicensed sites could be prosecuted.
The license fee would cost $10 million, having a set that is tax-rate 8.5 percent of gross gaming revenue. Once language has been agreed upon, the bill shall require two-thirds of the vote to pass.
New Bill Would Decriminalize Fantasy Sports in Washington
State Senator Pam Roach introduced a bill that could legalize fantasy sports games in the state of Washington. (Image: PamRoach.com)
The state of Washington is known for having a few of the harshest gambling that is online in the United States.
However these laws go even more than many realize: Washington additionally considers fantasy sports to be considered a form of gambling, meaning that players who put money into their online fantasy sports leagues are technically breaking the law, and could even be charged with a felony underneath the same guidelines that criminalize online poker and casino games.
That’s something which numerous officials that are local want to be changed.
With an estimated 500,000 residents in the state playing fantasy sports games, State Senator Pam Roach (R-31st District) says it’s time and energy to reclassify the contests being a game of skill instead than as luck-based gambling.
‘Our state views dream football being a game of chance a felony criminal activity,’ Roach said. ‘Congress has long considered dream football to be a casino game of ability. My bill will change the state’s definition.’
Washington Residents Restricted from Fantasy Sports Sites
Right now, many major online fantasy sports outlets block Washington residents from participating on their sites, including top daily fantasy sites like FanDuel and DraftKings.
Traditional season leagues that are long web sites like ESPN.com are usually open to Washington residents, however they are typically ineligible to win rewards.
The problem is that most states see dream sports as a game title of ability.
But the Washington State Gambling Commission nevertheless sees luck as being a big factor that is enough classify it as gambling under present state laws.
‘There’s always the opportunity the Seattle Seahawks will keep coming back from two touchdowns down with two minutes left,’ said commission chairman Chris Stearns, discussing the Seahawks’ improbable comeback within the NFC Championship game last weekend. ‘Whereas in many states, the proven fact that you have invested all of this time poring over stats and making your very own spreadsheets, that’s the skill part, and that weighs most greatly.’
Sports Betting Would Remain Prohibited
Underneath the proposed law, there would remain a prohibition on placing bets on the outcome of real-world sporting events.
However, both daily and season-long fantasy sports could be expressly legal, even for real cash play.
The bill seemingly have better odds than a bill that is similar would decriminalize and regulate online poker; the dream sports bill has bi-partisan support and has now acquired a number of sponsors on both edges of the aisle.
Companion bills have been completely introduced in both the House of Representatives and their state Senate.
The Fantasy supports the legalization effort Sports Trade Association, a market group based out of Chicago.
According to your combined group, more than 41 million people in America and Canada play fantasy sports, and nearly half of them perform for real money.
‘We think residents of Washington is in a position to play the full variety of fantasy sports contests offered in 45 other states and be able to win prizes in free contests offered by major media organizations,’ stated relationship chairman Peter Schoenke in a statement.
Washington is one of five states in which residents are typically blocked from playing on daily dream sports sites.
As we recently reported, momentum is increasing in several of these states to legalize games that are such recently, a Montana lawmaker introduced a bill that would allow residents to be involved in contests where the entry charge ended up being $100 or less.
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker Rejects Kenosha Casino Project
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has rejected a proposed casino in Kenosha, with some saying the move may be pertaining to his presidential aspirations. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has put the kibosh on a proposed casino plan, saying that building the venue would be too costly simply to taxpayers to be permitted.
In a statement, Walker stated that the continuing state might have been liable for up to $100 million to the Potawatomi tribe, which has a casino in Milwaukee, due to agreements between the tribe and their state.
Under the compact that governs the agreement between Wisconsin therefore the Potawatomi tribe, hawaii is in charge of reimbursing the tribe for any revenue lost to other casinos that open in the state.
‘After a review that is comprehensive of potential economic impact of the proposed Kenosha casino project, the danger to hawaii’s taxpayers is too great,’ Walker stated in a statement. ‘Due to the compacts negotiated by Governor Doyle, the cost that is current taxpayers of approving the proposed casino project is as much as $100 million plus the long-term economic hit to the state budget would be a potential loss of billions of bucks.’
The new casino, which would have cost about $800 million to build, would be to be described as a joint venture between the Menominee Tribe and complex Rock, which would have been responsible for running the casino. The task ended up being approved in 2013 by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, nonetheless it still needed approval through the governor of Wisconsin before it could get ahead.
Casino Supporters See Politics Behind Decision
While Walker stated the rejection was a option to protect residents of hawaii from a economic obligation, the Menominee Tribe saw other motivations behind his decision.
‘One tribe, the Forest County Potawatomi and one goal of Governor Walker, the presidency, has resulted in a ‘no’ for the people,’ the tribe stated in a declaration.
Many political observers believe that Walker could be arranging a run at the Republican nomination for the presidency in 2016. The Menominee statement suggested that Walker’s decision was made to placate conservatives who’re in opposition to casino gambling. One Iowa that is prominent conservative Tom Coates, recently had written a page to Walker urging him to reject the casino. That page ended up being additionally signed by 600 caucus that is potential from Iowa.
Regardless of the motivation behind Walker’s decision, numerous locals in Kenosha were disappointed in the decision.
‘ There were people ready to go to work down here, and that’s perhaps not planning to take place now,’ Kenosha Mayor Keith Bosman told WTMJ.
With Kenosha away from the real Way, Beloit Hopes for Federal Attention
It is feasible that Kenosha’s loss could be Beloit’s gain. Supporters of a Ho-Chunk Nation casino in the town hope that the rejection of the Menominee casino could mean that their project will now pass through federal review more quickly.
The city and the tribe have had a deal that is preliminary place since 2012, but officials say they certainly were told that the Bureau of Indian Affairs were delaying a choice in part because of the Kenosha proposal. The Ho-Chunk were publicly in opposition to the Kenosha project.
Despite the rejection, however, the Menominee say they will soldier on.
‘We must remember all the Menominee Nation has overcome much more than 10,000 years,’ the tribe said in a declaration. ‘ We will continue to thrive as being a Nation and will continue to be partners that are honorable Indian Tribes ladbrokes casino apps in Wisconsin and around the country.’